Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Smith v. Jovanovich et al
as 6:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Karl Smith
Defendant:
Sam Jovanovich, Scott Clark, Ron McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Laurence Stewart
Defendant:
Leroy Kirkegard, Mike Batista, Loraine Wodnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Karl Smith
Defendant:
State of Montana, Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanham v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2015cv00009
Plaintiff:
Thomas Creel Lanham
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard
Defendant:
Sam Jovanovich, Ronald McDonald and Dave Pentland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillingham v. Unit Manager Jovanovich et al
as 6:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Gillingham
Defendant:
Unit Manager Jovanovich and Sgt. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Amberg et al
as 2:2008cv00069
Plaintiff:
James L. Larson
Defendant:
Ed Ambry, Mike Mahoney, McDonald, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. McDonald et al
as 4:2008cv00058
Plaintiff:
James L. Larson
Defendant:
James McDonald, Johnson, Tart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hatchard v. McDonald et al
as 4:2007cv00063
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hatchard
Defendant:
James McDonald, T. Schnee and Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dubois v. McDonald, Warden et al
as 4:2007cv00055
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dubois
Defendant:
McDonald, Warden, Law, Varnum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brunson v. Luly et al
as 4:2007cv00012
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Brunson, Jr.
Defendant:
Scott Luly, James McDonald and Theresa Schnee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
