Cases 1 - 10 of 10
POSTIE v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2021cv00316
Defendant:
SHANE DADY, MR. NORRIS, MR. HAMILTON and others
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK A. POSTIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JOHNSON v. HILL et al
as 2:2021cv00300
Defendant:
THORNTON, CT. COLLINS, KYLE MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWTON v. O'NEILL et al
as 2:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
FRED LAWTON
Defendant:
JOSEPH O'NEILL, JOHN J. NORRIS, RISA VETRIFERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Obama et al
as 1:2013cv03084
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. O., M. O., Director Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Anesburg et al
as 1:2013cv01621
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Anesburg, Mary McCollum, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv01168
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Norris
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. SMINKEY et al
as 2:2013cv02057
Plaintiff:
NORRIS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WILLIAM T. SMINKEY, MICHAEL PECKO, WOMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruden v. Schuillkill County Doctor et al
as 3:2007cv01847
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pruden
Defendant:
Schuillkill County Doctor, Camp Hill SOU & Doctors, Cresson Ms. Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. County of Lycoming et al
as 1:2007cv00907
Plaintiff:
Leon Norris
Defendant:
County of Lycoming, David Desmond, Catherine Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eakle v. Tennis et al
as 4:2007cv00725
Plaintiff:
Charlie Eakle
Defendant:
Franklin Tennis, Robert Myers, Napp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
