Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mahammend v. Neil et al
as 1:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Khalid Austin Mahammend
Defendant:
Neil, Gail Watts and Olds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldstein v. Trammell et al
as 8:2018cv02429
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Henrico County Chief Police, Officer D. Trammell and others
Plaintiff:
David Scott Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hargett v. Johns Hopkins Hospital et al
as 1:2017cv01119
Plaintiff:
Kim L. Hargett, Sr.
Defendant:
Johns Hopkins Hospital, Raymond Neil Borland, Thomas J. Polasck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cottman v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2016cv03306
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cottman
Defendant:
State of Maryland, DPSCS - Secretary - Stephen Moyer, Tyrone Crowder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Younger v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2016cv03269
Plaintiff:
Kevin Younger
Defendant:
State of Maryland , Jermiah I. Green, Richard N. Hanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tunstall v. Hogan et al
as 8:2015cv01580
Plaintiff:
Marcus Tunstall
Defendant:
Larry Hogan, George C. Edwards, Joseph M Getty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanderhurst v. Mohardt
as 8:2013cv02143
Plaintiff:
Avery C. Vanderhurst
Defendant:
Neil Mohardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Swain v. O'Malley et al
as 8:2011cv03256
Plaintiff:
Kiari Christopher Swain
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Anthony G. Brown, Rod J. Rosenstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holtzman v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2010cv01945
Plaintiff:
Todd Neil Holtzman
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Correct RX Pharmacy and Isaias Tessema, (MD)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeLane v. Howad County et al
as 8:2007cv01881
Plaintiff:
Robert R. DeLane
Defendant:
Howad County, Delight Carole Coville, Neil Edward Axel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
