Cases 1 - 10 of 16
GOODE v. WERNER et al
as 2:2023cv02109
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
BRIAN WERNER, THOMAS ROLA, JR, P/O NELL J CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAZYCK v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv01182
Plaintiff:
KAREEM M. MAZYCK
Defendant:
GEORGE M. LITTLE and CORRECTIONS OFFICER NEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
PENDLETON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JUVENILE PROBATION OFFICE et al
as 2:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY JUVENILE PROBATION OFFICE, DOCTOR NEIL ROSENBLUM and DENNIS A. LOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Leach v. Biscoe et al
as 4:2020cv01429
Defendant:
Neil Inch-Diorio, Robert W Kelley, Diane Daya and others
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Leach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guerrier v. Desimone et al
as 3:2019cv02216
Defendant:
Nanda Palissery, Neil Murphy, Paul P. Ackourey and others
Plaintiff:
Caleb Guerrier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIREY v. EMERY et al
as 5:2019cv00535
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #2, NEIL EMERY, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SHIREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCE et al v. PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT (M.D.PA.) et al
as 5:2018cv05277
Defendant:
THOMAS DARR, PENNSYLVANIA SUPREM COURT (E.D.PA.), C.J. THOMAS SAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MITCHELL, ANTHONY LYONS, AESHA LYONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENTLEY v. NEIL et al
as 2:2017cv04697
Plaintiff:
WILLIE M. BENTLEY
Defendant:
NEIL, ADAMS, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Hara v. Mosher et al
as 3:2017cv00916
Plaintiff:
Thomas O'Hara
Defendant:
Neil Mosher and Mark Berkoski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. HAVERFORD TWP POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2015cv04850
Plaintiff:
PETER WALKER
Defendant:
HAVERFORD TWP POLICE DEPT., THOMAS F. SCARPATO, JR., JEFFREY STEIGEWALT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
