Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Tankesly v. TN Department of Corrections et al (PSLC1)
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Calvin-Otis Tankesly, Jr.
Defendant:
TN Department of Corrections, Lisa Helton, Lee Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Mehr et al
as 1:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
James Otis Mitchell, Jr.
Defendant:
John Mehr, Scott Conger and Madison County Government Official
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Holland et al
as 2:2018cv02412
Plaintiff:
James E. Morrow
Defendant:
Josie Holland, Chris B. Craft, Otis Higgs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01725
Plaintiff:
Tracy Woodard
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., John Doe, f/n/u Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beaty v. Morris et al
as 2:2013cv02999
Plaintiff:
Charles Otis Beaty, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffery Morris and Roslyn Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whipple v. Schofield et al
as 1:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Robert Zenas Whipple, III
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodall, Constance Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby et al v. Hall et al
as 3:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
William Davidson Hamby, Jr., Byron Shannon, Otis Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Sherrill Greene, Paul Babb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv02752
Plaintiff:
Casey Colbert
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County, City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timmons v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv02696
Plaintiff:
Michael Timmons
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County, City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rea et al
as 1:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
Harold D. Jones
Defendant:
Kevin Rea, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Jerry Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
