Civil Rights Cases filed in Alabama
Pearson v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00379
Defendant: State of Alabama, Patrice Richie Jones, Steven T. Marshall and others
Plaintiff: Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Bradley
as 7:2019cv00149
Plaintiff: Freya Pearson
Defendant: Patricia A Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Watson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00379
Defendant: COI Watson, COI Madison and COI Quarrel
Plaintiff: Andre Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagby v. Baker et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00903
Plaintiff: Dwain Matthew Bagby
Defendant: John Baker, Ventress Correctional Facility, Ventress Classification Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotton v. Onderdonk et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00492
Plaintiff: Aven H. Cotton
Defendant: Michael Onderdonk, Robert Keahey, Sr., Richard Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Norman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00482
Plaintiff: Thurman Dewayne Pearson
Defendant: Teresa Mitchell Norman, Famous A. Abston, Jennifer N. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Mack et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00466
Plaintiff: Devin C Pearson
Defendant: Huey "Hoss Mack and Charles Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Allen et al
as 2:2010cv01008
Plaintiff: Michael Jerome Pearson, Jr
Defendant: Richard Allen and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. CMS Correctional Medical Services et al
as 6:2008cv02423
Plaintiff: Jeremiah Pearson
Defendant: CMS Correctional Medical Services, Freddie Butler, Joy McCracken and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?