Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lopes v. Phillips
as 1:2016cv11927
Respondent:
Michael Phillips
Petitioner:
Joao Lopes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Seams v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2014cv13301
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Seams
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Raymond Marchilli, Phillip Kong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12686
Plaintiff:
Phillip King
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12755
Plaintiff:
Joseph Phillips
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Wall et al
as 1:2014cv11482
Plaintiff:
Gerald M. Hill
Defendant:
Josh Wall, Cesar Archilla, Charlene Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 4:2013cv40074
Plaintiff:
David Morse Phillips
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, City of Worcester, Joseph D. Early and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sabree v. Ireland et al
as 4:2011cv40192
Defendant:
Roderick L. Ireland, Francis X. Spina, Judith A. Cowin and others
Plaintiff:
G. Saif Sabree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mercado v. Marchetti et al
as 1:2010cv10830
Plaintiff:
Phillipe Mercado
Defendant:
Michelle Marchetti, Schlimon, Rooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Massachusetts Parole Board et al
as 4:2010cv40085
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Phillips
Defendant:
Massachusetts Parole Board, Mark A. Conrad, Roger Michel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aldrich et al v. Breen et al
as 1:2009cv10352
Plaintiff:
Robert Aldrich and Phillip O'Brien
Defendant:
Michael Breen, Lawrence Lundrigan, Neely and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
