Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Alfonzo Salley v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 13-3851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONZO B. SALLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, BRENDA LYNN TRITT, Deputy Superintendent and others
Gentilquore v. Glunt et al
as 3:2011cv01949
Defendant:
Steven R. Glunt, David L. Kessling, Randall E. Britton and others
Plaintiff:
Darren R. Gentilquore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Taylor et al
as 3:2010cv02659
Plaintiff:
Rhonshawn Jackson
Defendant:
Taylor , English , R.H.U. Lt. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Bricker v. Michael Harlow, et al
as 10-3295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW, FRED J. RUFFO, WILLIAM AYERS and others
Ronald Bricker v. Turner, et al, et al
as 10-2275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant - Appellee:
TURNER, RANDALL E. BRITTON, C. SMITH and others
Bricker v. Turner et al
as 1:2010cv00479
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Turner, Randall E. Britton, C Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdul Ideen v. Straub, et al
as 09-4385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL IDEEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STRAUB, CRAMER and CYNTHIA L. KECHISEN
Defendant - Non-Participating:
PAUL SMEALS, JEFFREY BEARD, RANDALL E. BRITTON and others
Bricker v. Ruffo et al
as 1:2009cv01394
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Fred J. Ruffo, William Ayers, Michael W. Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard v. McVey et al
as 1:2009cv00666
Plaintiff:
Michael Leonard
Defendant:
Catherine C. McVey, Michael L. Green, Jeffrey R. Imboden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bricker v. Harlow et al
as 1:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Michael W. Harlow, Fred J. Ruffo, William Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
