Cases 1 - 10 of 18
King v. Shaw et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Steven Demote King
Defendant:
Dr. Shaw, Dr. Stone, K. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00379
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Patrice Richie Jones, Steven T. Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00995
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Defendant:
Dr. Siddig and Patrice Richie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brackins v. Myers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00858
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brackins
Defendant:
Walter Myers and Patrice Richie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slater v. Askew et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00672
Plaintiff:
Demon Victorell Slater
Defendant:
Patrice Richie, Walter Myers, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Warden Myers et al
as 1:2016cv00219
Plaintiff:
Zadock Mehuge Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Myers, Warden Richie, Officer Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Olds et al
as 2:2015cv02318
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Defendant:
Centauria Olds, Patrice Richie, Wendy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Richie et al
as 2:2014cv00686
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Nicole Bruck Barnett
Defendant:
Patrice Richie and Alabama Department of Corrections
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00503
Plaintiff:
Michael James Craig
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Joseph Headley, Ossie Brown and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jemison v. Culliver et al
as 4:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jemison
Defendant:
Grant Culliver, Carter Davenport, Patrice Richie and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
