Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Nicolais v. Cheramie et al
as 2:2023cv07094
Plaintiff:
Christopher Vincent Nicolais
Defendant:
Brad Cheramie, Robert Shaw, Detective Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Stinson et al
as 3:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Edwin Rivera
Defendant:
Chris Stinson, Madison County Correction Medical Staff and Medical Staff Madison Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2022cv03672
Plaintiff:
Marlon Green and Marlon Jenerro Green
Defendant:
Louisiana State, VA MC New Orleans, VTSN 16 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alonzo et al v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, et al
as 1:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alonzo, Jaun Frausto, Bairo Cardona Perez and others
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium and Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Martinez v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, et al
as 1:2022cv01778
Plaintiff:
Pablo Rivera Martinez
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium and Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. I C E et al
as 1:2019cv00152
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Johnson
Defendant:
I C E, Justin M Demoura, D O S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. I C E et al
as 1:2018cv01427
Defendant:
Kirstjen M Nielsen, Marc J Moore, Field Operations Directors I C E D R O and others
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anekwu v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2018cv01567
Defendant:
Kirstjen M Nielsen, U S Government, Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff:
Henry C Anekwu, Henary Anekwu and Henery Anekwu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
