Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Corscadden v. Jesson et al
as 0:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gary Corscadden
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2013cv02958
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favors v. Hoover et al
as 0:2013cv00428
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant:
Michelle Hoover, Cal Ludeman, Lucinda Jesson and others
McMoore v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00318
Plaintiff:
Earl Stephan McMoore
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Swanson et al
as 0:2011cv03728
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Taylor
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Swanson et al
as 0:2011cv03712
Plaintiff:
Eugene Christopher Banks
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beals v. Benson et al
as 0:2011cv03121
Plaintiff:
William Beals
Defendant:
Dennis Benson, Lucinda Jesson, Greg Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krych v. DHS MSOP-ML, April 6, 2011, Client Placement Committee members and participants et al
as 0:2011cv03091
Plaintiff:
Chris Krych
Defendant:
DHS MSOP-ML, April 6, 2011, Client Placement Committee members and participants, Kent Johansen, Barbara Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larsen v. Benson et al
as 0:2011cv03025
Plaintiff:
Daniel Larsen
Defendant:
Dennis Benson, Lucinda Jesson, Greg Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Jesson et al
as 0:2011cv01706
Plaintiff:
Eugene Christopher Banks
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson, Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
