Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Johnson Sr. v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Alfred Johnson Sr.
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Devin Hoover, U.M.MS. Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson Sr. v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Alfred Johnson Sr.
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Devin Hoover, U.M.MS. Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simone v. City of Cleveland
as 1:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
James Simone
Defendant:
City of Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Palomino v. Cuyahoga County, Ohio et al
as 1:2021cv02139
Plaintiff:
Novelle Palomino
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County, Ohio, City of Cleveland Police Dept. 601, Michael Moctezuma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. Hamilton County Clerk of Courts and Justice Center et al
as 1:2021cv00004
Defendant:
Hamilton County Clerk of Courts and Justice Center, Officer Fritz, Honorable Simon Leis and others
Plaintiff:
Sean C. Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Simone, et al.
as 1:2019cv01090
Defendant:
Jim Simone, LCJ, Sheffield Lake Mayor Bring and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Lawson et al
as 1:2013cv00652
Plaintiff:
Charles Chapman
Defendant:
Steven Lawson, Agents of Regional Narcotics Unit and Organized Crime Divison, Mark Tiereny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penland v. Deters et al
as 1:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Alex Penland
Defendant:
Joseph T. Deters, Melinda Rinehart, Simon Leis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. Leis et al
as 1:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Stewart
Defendant:
Simon Leis, TechCare, NaphCare Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawan v. Olthaus et al
as 1:2011cv00374
Plaintiff:
Yusef Mujahid Dawan
Defendant:
C Olthaus, LT. Scheffler and Simon Leis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
