Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Brisco v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2020cv00366
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Dr. Siddiqui, Dr. Goldman and others
Plaintiff:
Steshawn Brisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Savary v. Towle et al
as 2:2018cv02575
Defendant:
T. Towle and A. Jaime
Plaintiff:
Keffier Savary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Savary v. Towle et al
as 1:2018cv01305
Defendant:
T. Towle and A. Jaime
Plaintiff:
Keffier Savary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dee Towles v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 18-16218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEE V. TOWLES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, NDOC Director, ISIDRO BACA, Warden, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PHARMACY and others
Jimenez v. Richardson et al
as 2:2018cv01727
Plaintiff:
Salvador M. Jimenez
Defendant:
Paul K. Richardson, Jay Linden, Allison Zuela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dee Towles v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 18-15253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEE V. TOWLES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, NDOC Director, ISIDRO BACA, Warden, HAMILTON, Correctional Officer NNCC and others
Towles v. Bisbee et al
as 3:2018cv00036
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Chief of Nevada Department of Parole & Probation, Chistopher Derrico and others
Plaintiff:
Dee V. Towles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Towles v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2017cv00177
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, James Dzurenda and Nevada Department of Corrections Pharmacy
Plaintiff:
Dee V. Towles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Towles v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2017cv00109
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Caldwell Barr, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Dee V. Towles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Towles v. Mobile Co Circuit Court et al
as 1:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
Rolland Sean Towles
Defendant:
Mobile Co Circuit Court, District Atty Office, DART Restitution Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
