Civil Rights Cases
Mack v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00318
Defendant: FNU Bryd, Sgt. FNU Brenen, Lt. FNU Staples and others
Plaintiff: Billy Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Cummings et al
as 1:2022cv00183
Plaintiff: John Henry Ramos
Defendant: Judge Sam R Cummings, Judge James Wesley Hendrix, Judge John R. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peters v. Texas Dept Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2021cv02448
Plaintiff: Michael G Peters
Defendant: Texas Dept Criminal Justice, The State Of Texas and M Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pike v. Livingston et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv03372
Petitioner: Henry Pike
Respondent: Brad Livingston, Stephen Willams, Shawn Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Emerson v. Rissie Owens, et al
as 13-50958
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER J. EMERSON
Defendant - Appellee: RISSIE OWENS, Chairman, Texas Board Pardons & Parole, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director, Texas Dept. Criminal Justice, RICK THALER, Director-T.D.C.J.-C.I.D. and others
Balcerowicz v. Estelle Unit TDCJ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00310
Plaintiff: Larry Balcerowicz , Jr
Defendant: Estelle Unit TDCJ, UTMB/TDCJ Medical Dept Galveston, TX, Texas Dept. Criminal Justice Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunnicutt v. O'Neal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv03721
Plaintiff: Roy Lee Hunnicutt
Defendant: Melinda O'Neal, Rissie Owens, Angela Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duenez vs Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, et al
as 7:2007cv00045
Plaintiff: Salvador Duenez
Defendant: Texas Dept. Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Executive Board Pardon and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?