Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Owens v. Windom et al
as 5:2020cv01043
Defendant:
Susan Odom, Honorable Judge Mary B Windom, Honorable Judge Chris Sherer and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Paul Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. Boatwright et al
as 1:2019cv00209
Defendant:
Russ Gulley, Tom Boatwright and Taylor Watson
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Dees, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. Boatwright et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00221
Defendant:
Russ Gulley, Tom Boatwright and Taylor Watson
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Dees, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veteto v. Clerks, Judges and Justices of Alabama Courts et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00689
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Veteto
Defendant:
Clerks, Judges and Justices of Alabama Courts, Gregory O. Griffin, Lyn Stuart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Files v. Tallapoosa County Narcotics Task Force et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2016cv00770
Plaintiff:
Earnest J. Files, Jr.
Defendant:
Tallapoosa County Narcotics Task Force, Jimmy Abbett, E. Paul Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarrell v. Davis et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
George Edward Jarrell
Defendant:
Tom Davis, Shane Hamilton and Tyler Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simons v. Chambers County Circuit Court et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2015cv00840
Plaintiff:
Joshua S. Simons
Defendant:
Chambers County Circuit Court, Tom Young and Roland L. Sledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carstarphen v. Mobile County Sheriff et al
as 1:2015cv00519
Plaintiff:
Tom Carstarphen
Defendant:
Mobile County Sheriff, Mobile Police Department, Iea A Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Freeman v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
Cardaryl Freeman
Defendant:
Gerald Allen, Billy Beasley, Scott Beason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Smith
as 5:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
James C Spencer
Defendant:
Tom Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
