Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LoCurto et al v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
Stephen LoCurto, Stephanie Hoefling and Michael LoCurto
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Metropolitan Detention Center Brooklyn, NY, Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. United States Bureau of Prison et al
as 1:2021cv01050
Defendant:
New York City Health Commission Successive, United States Bureau of Prison, Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center Executive Directors and Staffs and others
Plaintiff:
Elio Ortegas Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. The United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv06187
Plaintiff:
Ulysses T Ware
Defendant:
The United States Bureau of Prisons, Loretta Lynch, The Department of Justice and Its Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venkataram v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv07143
Defendant:
Dynan, J Hollingsworth, Tracie Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Natarajan Venkataram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Moshier v. Samuels et al
as 9:2013cv00989
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Moshier, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Paul M. Laird, Agnus McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Modena v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 9:2012cv00884
Plaintiff:
Michael John Modena
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons and Several Named and Un-Named Prison Officials, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Modena v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv00469
Plaintiff:
Michael John Modena
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons and Several Named and Un-Named Prison Officials, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zandstra v. Cross et al
as 1:2010cv05143
Plaintiff:
Randall Zandstra
Defendant:
James Cross, Elizabeth Hass, Michael Tracy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
