Cases 1 - 10 of 12,314
v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00166
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
BAEZ v. MCCULLOUGH et al
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN BAEZ
Defendant:
STACI M. MCCULLOUGH, JONATHAN MATSON and TWELVE JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brennan v. Monroe County Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Andrew Patrick Brennan
Defendant:
Monroe County Correctional Facility, Warden Garry Haidle, Director of Treatment Lea Baylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Segura, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Julio Ceasar Segura, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Michael Gourley, Major Albert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burroughs v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Burroughs
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
PAGE v. PRIORE et al
as 2:2024cv02462
Plaintiff:
KYLE PAGE
Defendant:
CHIEF PATRICK PRIORE, BRIAN VITKO, HOME DEPOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FATA
as 5:2024cv02402
Not Yet Classified:
ABRAHIM FATA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zierke v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Gary Zierke
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
NASH v. PHILA DISTRICT ATTY et al
as 2:2024cv02437
Plaintiff:
AASIM NASH
Defendant:
PHILA DISTRICT ATTY, PHILA PUB. DEF. and NEW VITAE DR. BEHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CLARK DOUGLAS III
Defendant:
ZAKEN and BUZAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
