Cases 1 - 10 of 12,307
FATA
as 5:2024cv02402
Not Yet Classified:
ABRAHIM FATA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zierke v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Gary Zierke
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
CLARK v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CLARK DOUGLAS III
Defendant:
ZAKEN and BUZAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NASH v. PHILA DISTRICT ATTY et al
as 2:2024cv02437
Plaintiff:
AASIM NASH
Defendant:
PHILA DISTRICT ATTY, PHILA PUB. DEF. and NEW VITAE DR. BEHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POMROY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01416
Plaintiff:
SHERRI POMROY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DOE, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER ADAM TRUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Youmans v. Nickolas et al
as 3:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Youmans
Defendant:
Wendy Nickolas, Ms. Lampert, Deborah Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRITTEN v. BRYAN-HENDERSON et al
as 2:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
GERALD L. CRITTEN
Defendant:
DIRECTOR LENA BRYAN-HENDERSON and PUBLIC DEFENDER ALEXA GRISTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. SCI-Dallas Mailroom Staff et al
as 4:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Shaun Austin
Defendant:
SCI-Dallas Mailroom Staff and Former Superintendent Ransom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
LOMBARDO v. WESCOE et al
as 5:2024cv01385
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. LOMBARDO
Defendant:
COLIN WESCOE, DET. SGT. HAMMER, DET. P. MACZKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swinson v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Lydell Swinson
Defendant:
CO Smith, Unit Manager Heenan, Unit Manager Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
