Cases 101 - 110 of 1,579
Couch v. Clay County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Clay County, Kentucky, Linda Smallwood and Gloria Zerbee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Clay County Detention Center et al
as 6:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center, Linda Smallwood, Redemption Road Recovery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Zerbee
as 6:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Advent Health Manchester and Gloria Zerbee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Henderson (Lt)
as 5:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lamont Bailey
Defendant:
Dustin Henderson (Lt)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Henderson (Lt)
as 0:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lamont Bailey
Defendant:
Dustin Henderson (Lt)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Gilley
as 6:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Charles Jackson
Defendant:
J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harris v. FCI Manchester
as 6:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sherrod L. Harris
Defendant:
FCI Manchester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Simpson v. Day et al
as 5:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Joshua Emmanuel Simpson
Defendant:
Connie Day, Dan Brown, Craig Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Clay County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center, Linda Smallwood, Kevin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. McKenzie et al
as 0:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
Shawn McKenzie, Brian Dickerson, Joshua Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
