Cases 111 - 120 of 1,579
Gooch v. Vaughn et al
as 1:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Sherrick Jamar Gooch
Defendant:
Eric Vaughn, Mason Barnes and Mark Thurmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Henderson (Lt)
as 5:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lamont Bailey
Defendant:
Dustin Henderson (Lt)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Worley v. Broyles et al
as 5:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
David Worley
Defendant:
Derran C Broyles, Carla Cannon, Sarah Sons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. FCI Manchester
as 6:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sherrod L. Harris
Defendant:
FCI Manchester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jackson v. Gilley
as 6:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Charles Jackson
Defendant:
J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Simpson v. Day et al
as 5:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Joshua Emmanuel Simpson
Defendant:
Connie Day, Dan Brown, Craig Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Grayson County Detention Center et al
as 4:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Terrance Clarke
Defendant:
Grayson County Detention Center, Jason Woosley, Roy Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shannon v. Bourbon County et al
as 5:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon
Defendant:
Bourbon County, Sheriff Tony Asbury, Jailer West Burberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. McKenzie et al
as 0:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
Shawn McKenzie, Brian Dickerson, Joshua Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Couch v. Corrections Department, KY Commonwealth of et al
as 6:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Corrections Department, KY Commonwealth of and Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
