Cases 121 - 130 of 1,581
Dawson v. Mock
as 0:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dawson
Defendant:
Delsa Mock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Couch v. Corrections Department, KY Commonwealth of et al
as 6:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Corrections Department, KY Commonwealth of and Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gooch v. Vaughn et al
as 1:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Sherrick Jamar Gooch
Defendant:
Eric Vaughn, Mason Barnes and Mark Thurmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Worley v. Broyles et al
as 5:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
David Worley
Defendant:
Derran C Broyles, Carla Cannon, Sarah Sons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Clay County Detention Center et al
as 6:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center, Linda Smallwood and Anthony Wagers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. BOP
as 6:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Rafael D Foster
Defendant:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Frazer v. Federal Bureau of Prisons FMC Lexington
as 5:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
John J. Frazer
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons FMC Lexington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson v. Daniels et al
as 3:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Brison Stephenson
Defendant:
Aaron Daniels, Jailer Darrell Cox, Deputy Robert Gravett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damron v. Messenger et al
as 0:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Damron
Defendant:
A. Messenger, J. Oslin, Mr. Niccolo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Julick v. Jordon et al
as 5:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Jacob Julick
Defendant:
Scott Jordon, Jason Denny, Lauren Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
