Cases 121 - 130 of 1,489
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02260
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02250
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Shelby County Sheriff Office Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02252
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02251
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Dean
as 1:2023cv01068
Plaintiff:
Bradley Pierce Alexander
Defendant:
Mirana Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Staton et al
as 2:2023cv02111
Plaintiff:
Cedric Dixon
Defendant:
M. Staton, T.B.I., James Jeffery Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02239
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County City, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
as 2:2023cv02229
Plaintiff:
Andre Jerome Willis
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westbrook v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
Rachel Westbrook
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Kirk Fields, Michael Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
