Prison Condition Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 151 - 160 of 197
Applegarth v. North Central Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01207
Petitioner: Mark A Applegarth
Respondent: Warden North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benavidez v. Stansberry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv03334
Plaintiff: Milton Alvarado Benavidez
Defendant: Youngstown Receptional Center, Medical Director for Youngstown Receptional Center, J. Artic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. McFaul
as 1:2007cv02686
Plaintiff: James D. Sullivan
Defendant: Gerald T. McFaul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed, et. al v. Collins, et. al
as 4:2007cv02160
Plaintiff: Robert J. Reed and Carmen R. Stavole
Defendant: Terry J. Collins, Paul A. Shoemaker, Mark Houk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Storm v. Shartle We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv01671
Plaintiff: Daniel Storm
Defendant: Shartle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. City of Canton, Ohio Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2007cv01028
Plaintiff: Gary Carter
Defendant: City of Canton, Ohio Sheriff's Department, City of Canton, Ohio Police Department, Michael A. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Massillon Municipal Court
as 5:2006cv02824
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bristow v. Ball, et al.
as 1:2006cv00734
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dina v. Lorain Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2006cv02136
Stuart v. U.S. Marshalls
as 3:2006cv02115
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?