Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Strawberry v. Mendrick et al
as 1:2020cv05948
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe 6, DuPage Health Care Unite and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Hampton Strawberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Wexford Health Source Inc et al
as 4:2019cv04076
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Unknown Correctional Officers, Leonta Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathon P Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reimann v. Templeton et al
as 1:2019cv00142
Defendant:
Jennifer "Doe", LaSalle Co. Sheriff Dept., "John" Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Reimann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrickson et al v. Metropolitan Correctional Center of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv04637
Defendant:
McCormick, Macdonald, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy B Fredrickson and Jason A Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oden et al v. True et al
as 3:2018cv00600
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Oden, Daryl Hampton, Jason Nielson and others
Defendant:
William B. True, Donald Boyce, Jeff Sessions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stubbs v. Lamb et al
as 3:2017cv00838
Plaintiff:
Kent Stubbs
Defendant:
Nicholas Lamb, Mr. Densmore, Mr. Kone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCaskill v. Reed et al
as 3:2017cv00748
Plaintiff:
Stephen Douglas McCaskill
Defendant:
W. Reed, Officer Willford, Officer Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2016cv09215
Plaintiff:
Ian Charles Armstrong
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois, Thomas Dart, Toni Preckwinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv03327
Plaintiff:
Lamont Armstrong
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, John Doe(s) and Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Ricky Armstrong
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
