Prison Condition Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 30
May v. Taylor et al
as 1:2012cv00156
Plaintiff: Floyd May
Defendant: Gladyse Taylor, Michael Randle, Roger E. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Pfister et al
as 1:2011cv09116
Plaintiff: Jonathan Coleman
Defendant: Randy Pfister, Michael Lemke, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rasho v. Hardy et al
as 1:2011cv03512
Plaintiff: Ashoor Z Rasho
Defendant: Marcus Hardy, R. Phister, Guy D. Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv02701
Plaintiff: Bobby L Phillips
Defendant: Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Marcus Hardy, Guy D Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mahone et al
as 1:2010cv01289
Petitioner: Mason Williams
Respondent: Sylvia Mahone, Louis Shicker, Steven Taller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 10-2939
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee: C. DANBERG, RICK KEARNEY, MIKE COSTELLO and others
Debtor - Appellee: M. LITTLE
Anthony Fletcher v. Guy Pierce, et al
as 10-2131
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTHONY L. FLETCHER
Defendant - Appellee: GUY D. PIERCE and MELVIN, Superintendent
Thompson v. Quinn et al
as 1:2010cv01141
Plaintiff: Stanton J Thompson
Defendant: Pat Quinn, Michael P. Randle, Guy D Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleother Tidwell v. Guy Pierce, et al
as 09-4101
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLEOTHER TIDWELL
Defendant - Appellee: GUY D. PIERCE, PONTIAC CORRECTIONAL CENTER, PERSONAL PROPERTY OFFICE and others
Biggins v. Danberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00862
Plaintiff: James Arthur Biggins
Defendant: C. Danberg, T. Carroll, R. Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?