Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Pitts v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 2:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
Christian Pitts
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Wellpath Healthcare Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finnie v. State of Tennessee Depar54 et al
as 1:2022cv01204
Plaintiff:
Marico Finnie
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Depar54, State of Tenn Department of Corrections, Bert Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baxter v. Berwangner et al
as 2:2022cv02239
Plaintiff:
Robert Baxter
Defendant:
J. Berwangner, F/N/U Flowers, Warden Bowens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kephart v. John/Jane Doe et al
as 2:2021cv02768
Plaintiff:
Nove Jay Kephart, Jr.
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Dr. Benitez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagins v. Joe and/or Jane Doe et al
as 2:2021cv02522
Plaintiff:
Jerome Hagins
Defendant:
Joe and/or Jane Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ayers v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv02383
Defendant:
Cerelyn 'C.J.' Davis, John Doe I, Sergeant Miller (John Doe II) and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ayers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Owens et al
as 2:2021cv02270
Defendant:
Creig Pickles, Doe and Owens
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashley v. Genovese et al
as 1:2020cv01275
Defendant:
Kevin Genovese, John Doe #1, Gary Holder and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oxendine v. Medical Department Co. et al
as 3:2020cv00764
Defendant:
Medical Department Co., Robert C. Bryan and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Deborah F. Oxendine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. TDOC et al
as 1:2020cv01168
Defendant:
TDOC, Captain Lanum and John Doe (4 officers)
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
