Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Teaone Bell v. Kim Butler, et al
as 16-4052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEAONE S. BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, KENT BROOKMAN, Lieutenant and JASON HART
Kentes West v. Michael Atchison, et al
as 16-3985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENTES WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. ATCHISON, Warden, CEDRIC A. MCDONNOUGH, Correctional Officer, Menard Correctional Center, AARON HOOD, Correctional Officer, Menard Correctional Center and others
Kentes West v. Monica Nippe, et al
as 16-3702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENTES WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
MONICA NIPPE, KIM BUTLER and S. HILL
James Munson v. Kim Butler, et al
as 16-3651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MUNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, JIM WINTERS, Food Service Supervisor III, Menard Correctional Center, SUZANN GRISWOLD-BAILEY and others
Bryant v. Obama et al
as 1:2016cv09469
Plaintiff:
Winford Bryant
Defendant:
Barack Obama and Kim Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Teaone Bell v. Kimberly S. Butler, et al
as 16-3540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEAONE S. BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, DAVID L. EVELSIZER, TERRENCE T. JACKSON and others
Ned James v. Kim Butler, et al
as 16-3372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NED JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, SUDARSHAN SUNEJA, Doctor, MIRZA BAIG and others
Jermaine Craddock v. Kim Butler, et al
as 16-3246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMAINE CRADDOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, Chief Administrative Officer, LORI OAKLEY, Grievance Officer, JUSTIN SNELL, Correctional Officer and others
Kentes West v. Michael Atchison, et al
as 16-3221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENTES WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. ATCHISON, Warden, CEDRIC A. MCDONNOUGH, Correctional Officer, Menard Correctional Center, AARON HOOD, Correctional Officer, Menard Correctional Center and others
Brooks v. Mich et al
as 3:2016cv00818
Plaintiff:
Emanuel O Brooks
Defendant:
Lt Mich, Kenneth Donnals and Kim Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
