Cases 11 - 20 of 24
RODRIGUEZ v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07144
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL A. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06731
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06562
Plaintiff:
ANGEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. CAMDEN CO. CORR. FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06337
Plaintiff:
JENNILEE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CAMDEN CO. CORR. FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06340
Plaintiff:
GRACIANO RODRIGUEZ, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06218
Plaintiff:
NESTOR LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EUBANKS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv06237
Plaintiff:
EDWARD EUBANKS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, F. MACK, RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06213
Plaintiff:
FELIPE ROMAN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KNIGHT et al v. CITY OF TRENTON et al
as 3:2016cv02344
Plaintiff:
DONYELL KNIGHT and ZELINA KNIGHT
Defendant:
CITY OF TRENTON , TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT , ERNEST PARREY, JR and others
Cross_claimant:
ANTHONY POMPEI , COUNTY OF MERCER , CJ MCKENNA and others
Cross_defendant:
ABC ENTITIES 1-10, CITY OF TRENTON , RICHARD R. GIRMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2016cv01913
Plaintiff:
ASMAR THOMPSON
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, STEPHEN D'ILIO, COIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
