Cases 11 - 20 of 137
Jackson v. Woods et al
as 1:2023cv04846
Plaintiff:
Isaac C. Jackson
Defendant:
E. Woods, Sgt. Peck and Sgt Reinhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. CTO-Smith et al
as 1:2023cv03151
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Gray
Defendant:
CTO-Smith, Lt. Powell, Warden Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Wilks et al
as 3:2023cv50130
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Defendant:
Justin Wilks, Andrea Tack, Joanna Kemmeren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weathers v. Larry et al
as 1:2023cv01781
Plaintiff:
Lamon Weathers
Defendant:
Catherine Larry, Ryan Woods, Roxanne Martino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods-Jackson v. Young et al
as 4:2023cv04036
Plaintiff:
Davyon Woods-Jackson
Defendant:
. Young, C Sandholm, . Nessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Kane County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Kane County Jail, Kane County, Illinois, Ron Hain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monrose et al v. Woods et al
as 1:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Kathyleen A Monrose
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Woods, Larry, Sotto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Koltiwenzew et al
as 1:2022cv07301
Plaintiff:
Feliberto Flores Ramos
Defendant:
Chad Koltiwenzew, Todd, Corporal Bartucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hain et al
as 1:2022cv06791
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Smith
Defendant:
Ron Hain, c/o Bowers, c/o Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Jackson County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv02283
Plaintiff:
Derek Woods
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail, Connie Faulkenberry and Doctor Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
