Cases 21 - 30 of 322
SMITH v. DEAL et al
as 5:2017cv00425
Plaintiff:
H T SMITH
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, BRIAN OWENS and CEDRIC TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waseem Daker v. Homer Bryson, et al
as 17-14066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMER BRYSON, Commissioner, BRIAN OWENS, Former Commissioner, TIMOTHY WARD, Assistant Commissioner and others
Waseem Daker v. Patrick Head, et al
as 17-13799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK HEAD, JESSE D. EVANS, MARY E. STALEY and others
BROWN v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2017cv00249
Plaintiff:
KURTIS LEE BROWN
Defendant:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY L BARNARD, JAMES MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Bryson et al
as 5:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Delwin Berry
Defendant:
Bryson, Edwina Johnson, Ammos Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waseem Daker v. Homer Bryson, et al
as 17-11418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMER BRYSON, Commissioner, BRIAN OWENS, Former Commissioner, TIMOTHY WARD, Assistant Commissioner and others
Daniel Cobble v. Pete Smith, et al
as 16-17074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
PETE SMITH, U.S. GOVERNMENT and BRIAN OWENS
MITCHELL v. PAROLE BOARD OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2016cv00194
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G MITCHELL
Defendant:
PAROLE BOARD OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Murray, et al
as 6:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
Ernest Clayton
Defendant:
Dennis Murray, Emmitt Donahue, Brian Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OUTLAW v. OWENS et al
as 5:2016cv00456
Plaintiff:
CALVIN OUTLAW
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, TERRY E BARNARD, ALBERT MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
