Cases 21 - 30 of 70
FOLKES v. MAIORANA et al
as 9:2022cv81300
Plaintiff:
NICORDO FOLKES
Defendant:
C MAIORANA, W. Hamilton, ALMINNA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
FOLKES v. MAIORANA et al
as 3:2022cv10880
Plaintiff:
NICORDO FOLKES
Defendant:
C MAIORANA, W HAMILTON, ALMINNA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. The GEO Group, Inc., et al
as 9:2022cv80298
Plaintiff:
Derrick G. James
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc.,, Assistant Warden Lawrence, Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Tobitt v. Hamilton Correctional Institution Annex
as 3:2021cv00998
Plaintiff:
Timothy Tobitt
Defendant:
Hamilton Correctional Institution Annex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Inch et al
as 5:2021cv00385
Plaintiff:
James Authur Lee
Defendant:
Hamilton Correctional Institution
Respondent:
Mark Inch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratley v. Inch et al
as 3:2021cv00598
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Dr. Ira Lee, Dr. Leslie Columbani and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Ratley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Inch et al
as 3:2020cv00705
Defendant:
Mark Inch, G. Grioung, Hamilton Correctional Institution Annex and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest M. Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. NORTH FLORIDA RECEPTION MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 6:2020cv00980
Defendant:
Walker, Hamilton CI (Anx), Apalachee CI and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest R. Gibson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODARD v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2020cv00216
Plaintiff:
STEVE LARON WOODARD, SR
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAMILTON CI ANNEX and EASTBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00930
Defendant:
Warden of Hamilton, Annex and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
William Edward Perry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
