Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Gill v. Warden, USP Hazelton et al
as 6:2021cv00416
Defendant:
United States Marshal Services, Jason A. Sickler, Health Services, USP Hazelton and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. INCH
as 3:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON
Defendant:
MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2020cv05882
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv01091
Defendant:
Mark Mahon, Ronnie Fussell, Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua L Gordon and Jahmal C. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheldon v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00898
Defendant:
Marshall Herring, Willis, Columbia Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff:
Bradford A. Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frye v. Snider et al
as 2:2020cv00415
Defendant:
Lester Fernandez, N. Rincones, Secretary, DOC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Frye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2020cv00237
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall Jackson
Defendant:
C. Pugh, R. Schmidt, M. Sumner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Connolly et al
as 3:2020cv00145
Defendant:
Warden Christopher Hobtson, Centurian MHM Services, Robin Connolly and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WENK v. HOOPER et al
as 3:2019cv01991
Defendant:
MARSHALL, HOOPER, D DICE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C WENK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forney v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00692
Plaintiff:
James M Forney, Michael R. Molina and J. Michael Forney
Defendant:
Shannon Jernigan, Mark Inch, Marshall Herring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
