Cases 31 - 40 of 45
TRIPPETT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv05959
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE FRANK TRIPPETT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN P. DELANEY, LOUIS GIROLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. JOHN DOE I et al
as 2:2011cv04877
Plaintiff:
MELVIN W. GREEN
Defendant:
RICHARD PAULLMAN, CARROLL FORREST, JUAN ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONROE v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2011cv04812
Plaintiff:
LEONARD JAMAL MONROE, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN P. DELANEY, LOUIS GIORLA and PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FENWICK v. DELANEY
as 2:2011cv04465
Plaintiff:
RONALD FENWICK
Defendant:
JOHN P. DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHEWS v. CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2011cv04423
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MATHEWS
Defendant:
CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUMBEE v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2011cv03914
Plaintiff:
CADRE CUMBEE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., NUTTER, JOHN P. DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEDRAZA v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2011cv03179
Plaintiff:
MANUEL PEDRAZA
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN P. DELANEY, MAJOR MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMACHO v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2011cv02871
Plaintiff:
RICARDO CAMACHO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, GIORLA, JOHN P. DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PICKARD v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2011cv02422
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PICKARD
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN P. DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2011cv01874
Plaintiff:
BRAHIEM THOMPSON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, JOHN P. DELANEY and MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
