Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Baxter v. Lappin et al
as 1:2010cv01086
Plaintiff:
David Baxter
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, R. Wiley, M. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 10-1020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L WEINSHIENK, ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, LEWIS T. BABCOCK and others
Akers v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Robert Blackburn, Lewis T. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Zavala v. Davis et al
as 1:2009cv02801
Plaintiff:
Juan Zavala
Defendant:
Blake R. Davis, M. Collins and Krist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abdullah v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv02728
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Abdullah
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Davis, Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Davis et al
as 1:2009cv02319
Defendant:
. Krist, Davis and Krist
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Twitty v. Weinshienk, et al
as 09-1226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE J. TWITTY
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L WEINSHIENK, USDC Judge (Den), BOYD N. BOLAND, U.S. Magistrate Judge (Den), GREGORY C. LANGHAM, (USDC) Clerk (Den) and others
Twitty v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2009cv00350
Plaintiff:
Andre J. Twitty
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Boyd N. Boland, Gregory C. Langham and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Twitty v. Wiley et al
as 1:2008cv02251
Plaintiff:
Andre J. Twitty
Defendant:
Ronnie Wiley, Mike Nalley, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McCray v. Rios, et al
as 08-1372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE JAMES MCCRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
RIOS, Warden, In His Individual Capacity, J. JONES, Associate Warden, In His Individual Capacity, HANSEN, Captain, In His Individual Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
