Cases 31 - 40 of 205
Golden v. Ludvigson et al
as 2:2016cv00871
Plaintiff:
Parish M Golden
Defendant:
Paul Ludvigson , Kyle K Tritt, Brian Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Smith, Jr. v. William Pollard, et al
as 16-2759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. SMITH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM POLLARD, WAUPUN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, BRAD D. SCHIMEL, Attorney General and others
Hull v. Pollard et al
as 2:2016cv00642
Plaintiff:
Dewayne OB Hull
Defendant:
William Pollard , Cynthia Radtke and Anthony Meli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dwayne Almond v. William Pollard, et al
as 16-2156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAYNE ALMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM POLLARD, LESLEY BAIRD, COURTNEY ENDERS and others
Porter et al v. Hamblin et al
as 2:2016cv00553
Plaintiff:
Anthony Porter, Joeval M Jones, Samuel Warzyn and others
Defendant:
Gary Hamblin , David Burnett, James Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinley Bey v. Pollard et al
as 2:2016cv00521
Plaintiff:
La Ron McKinley Bey
Defendant:
William Pollard , Brian Foster, Tony Meli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Luchinski v. Tanner et al
as 2:2016cv00445
Plaintiff:
Shawn Luchinski
Defendant:
Bradley Tanner, Belinda Schrubbe, Brian Greff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers v. Foster et al
as 2:2016cv00331
Plaintiff:
David Elijah Bowers, Jr
Defendant:
Brian Foster , Tony Meli, William Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carthage v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00326
Plaintiff:
Charles E Carthage, Jr
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , Brown County, William Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Lindell v. William Pollard, et al
as 16-1528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL A. LINDELL
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM POLLARD, DAVID LEVEY, Correctional Officer, BRIAN GREFF and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
