Cases 41 - 50 of 63
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2014cv00347
Plaintiff:
WALTER LEE BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C ASHLEY ROYAL, HUGH LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOWREY v. TREADWELL et al
as 5:2014cv00349
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BLAKE LOWREY
Defendant:
MARC T TREADWELL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STAPLETON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. United States Of America
as 4:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Martin
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
COBBLE v. SMITH et al
as 5:2013cv00415
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
REGINALD SMITH, CHERIE PRICE, JO HUNDING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gil-Reyes v. United States of America
as 5:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
Franklin Gil-Reyes
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
John Taylor
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden, Henry Sexauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Johns et al
as 5:2013cv00065
Petitioner:
Rafael De Jesus Alvare Gomez
Respondent:
T. Johns and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00112
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THALKEN, THOMAS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arden v. United States Of America
as 2:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Reidar C. Arden
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Concklin v. Hastings et al
as 2:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Richard Concklin
Defendant:
Suzanne R. Hastings, United States of America, Dr. Libero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
