Cases 51 - 60 of 104
WALKER v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2018cv04935
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEON WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EWELL v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTION FACILITY et al
as 2:2018cv04872
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTION FACILITY, ASST WARDEN COLLUCCI, ADMIN MEDICAL SERVICES DPT and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY W. EWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANDON v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2018cv04852
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRANDON
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN AS OF and MEDICAL SERVICES DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRENCH v. THE GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04312
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and THE GEO GROUP INC.
Plaintiff:
MARK FRENCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABILI v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTION FACILITY
as 2:2018cv04255
Plaintiff:
ACHUZIA C. ABILI
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BUMBREY v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2018cv03595
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM JABAR BUMBREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAMB v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2018cv02554
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LAMB
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIEB v. GEO CORP et al
as 2:2018cv01321
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN P. LIEB, JR.
Defendant:
GEO CORP and ALL STAFF @ GEORGE W HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOTTLE v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2018cv00545
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY AMANDA HOTTLE
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2017cv03826
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY WHITE
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
