Cases 51 - 60 of 109
ELLIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 7:2016cv00121
Plaintiff:
RECKO M ELLIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NANCY PELOSI, JAMES COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSTER v. GEORGIA STATE OF et al
as 5:2016cv00309
Plaintiff:
RODERICK FRANK FOSTER
Defendant:
GEORGIA STATE OF, SAMUEL S OLENS, HOWARD Z SIMMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2016cv00098
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS LEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2016cv00097
Petitioner:
David Wayne Jackson
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Daker v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2016cv00158
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
United States Of America and Scott L. Poff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. United States Of America
as 6:2016cv00047
Petitioner:
Robert Elvin Mitchell
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fernandez-Torres v. Watts et al
as 2:2016cv00024
Plaintiff:
Manuel Fernandez-Torres
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, Raymond E. Holt, Anthony Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. United States Of America
as 2:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Johnson
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KIRKLAND v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
SCOTT KIRKLAND
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACKSON STATE PRISON, RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVADENEIRA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2015cv00229
Plaintiff:
FELIX GUZMAN RIVADENEIRA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, SERVICE PROCESSING CENTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
