Cases 71 - 80 of 127
Nia v. Asuncion et al
as 3:2013cv00353
Plaintiff:
Aasim Nia
Defendant:
D. Asuncion, A. Hedgpeth, R. T.C. Grounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Grounds et al
as 3:2013cv00256
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Martinez
Defendant:
R.T.C. Grounds, D. Anuncion, B. Hedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mack et al
as 4:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Smith
Defendant:
R. Mack, R.T.C. Grounds, G. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Priego v. Grounds et al
as 5:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Adrian Priego
Defendant:
Randy Grounds, Eric Sullivan, Darrin Bright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Cate et al
as 3:2012cv06287
Plaintiff:
Brian Douglas Martin
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Gregory Lewis, Anthony Hedgpeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Knapp v. James Tilton, et al
as 12-17684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY KNAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, MICHAEL S. EVANS, ARCEO and others
Richard Wright, Jr. v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-17690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD EDWARD WRIGHT, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of the California dpeartment of Corrections & Rehabilitation and RANDY GROUNDS, Warden
Anderson v. Deleon et al
as 3:2012cv06055
Plaintiff:
William Little Anderson
Defendant:
D. Deleon, A. Moreno, A. Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Asuncion et al
as 4:2012cv05935
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell
Defendant:
D. Asuncion, Facility B, Captain (B) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Grounds et al
as 5:2012cv05621
Plaintiff:
Oscar Jones
Defendant:
R. Grounds, N. Logan, S. Lacy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
