Cases 71 - 80 of 8,489
Franklin v. Dillman et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Imare' Damu' F.J. Franklin
Defendant:
S. Dillman and Glynn County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodas v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rodas
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Levon Allen, Victor Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danenberg v. Perry
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Danenberg
Defendant:
Warden James Kevin Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Jump et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Rebecca J. Walden, Roger B. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Chatham County Detention Center
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Williams
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. SMITH et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Quantovia Robinson
Defendant:
Counselor Smith, Officer Carver, Counselor Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Judge v. Ware County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Matthew David Judge
Defendant:
Ware County Jail, Cpl. Arnold, Cpl. McCulley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toles v. Newsome et al
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Quonterious Toles
Defendant:
Lt. Newsome and CO II Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bleach v. Puhala et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Defendant:
Emily Puhala, Emily Thomas, Larry Chisholm and others
Plaintiff:
Earnest Bleach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
