Cases 1 - 10 of 15
COHEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03658
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY COHEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EDDIE ANDERSON, EMERY MCCOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
K.O. et al v. SESSIONS, III et al
as 1:2020cv00309
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, JOHN DOE CBP AGENTS, JOHN DOE ORR PERSONNEL and others
Plaintiff:
C.J., F.C., L.J. and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WILLIAMS v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv02163
Plaintiff:
KELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, M. ROBINOWITZ, J. CHEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCIOLI v. CITY OF NEW BERN et al
as 1:2016cv00877
Plaintiff:
DANA SCIOLI
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BERN, COUNTY OF LOUDOUN, CIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. BITTINGER et al
as 1:2015cv00545
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
BITTINGER, MARCHANELLO, T. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANSER v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv00867
Plaintiff:
DAVID K. DANSER
Defendant:
GEORGE E. SAMUELS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RODNEY W. CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. SOWERS et al
as 1:2013cv01189
Plaintiff:
DAVID RAY BROWN
Defendant:
RODERICK SOWERS, KATHLEEN S. GREEN, JASON CLEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AGUIAR v. RECKTENWALD et al
as 1:2013cv00883
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN AGUIAR
Defendant:
M. RECKTENWALD, JEFF BUTLER, C. BERGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
STINE v. NEWTON et al
as 1:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant:
K. NEWTON, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATTLETON v. DOE et al
as 1:2010cv01850
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
