Cases 1 - 10 of 1,525
MOORE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
JOHN MOORE, III
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KROFT v. RATHAL et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE KROFT
Defendant:
RATHAL, JOHN DOE and K M ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. DeSantis et al
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Cole
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, City of Jacksonville, Patrick Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Alba et al
as 5:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Ortiz
Defendant:
FNU Alba, FNU Ozokpor, FNU Reins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moore v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
John Moore, III
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Franklin Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claudio v. DeLoach et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Raymond Claudio
Defendant:
H.D. Gator DeLoach, Breckenricke, Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norfleet v. Riggs et al
as 2:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Tino A. Norfleet
Defendant:
Officer E. Riggs, Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. SUTTON et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
SHER'MON A ALLEN
Defendant:
ADAM SUTTON, R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS, DONALD LEAVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. FOSKEY et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
ELIAS FOSKEY and JOHN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
