Cases 1 - 10 of 199
Williams v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2024cv03822
Plaintiff:
Amireon Williams
Defendant:
John D. Idleburg, N. Kalfas and Gholar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Lofgren et al
as 1:2024cv03618
Plaintiff:
Ce'Andre D Moore
Defendant:
M Lofgren, Yuhas, T Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherrod v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 1:2024cv01137
Plaintiff:
Joe N Sherrod
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Pamela E Hart, C Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruffin v. Wilhem et al
as 4:2024cv04059
Plaintiff:
Mwamba M Ruffin
Defendant:
Chase Wilhem, Mark N Williams, Tyrone Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinny v. McDowell et al
as 1:2024cv01132
Plaintiff:
James McKinney
Defendant:
N McDowell and T Brandmeyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Perry v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv50119
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Mr. Avery, Karen Smiddy, Mr. Bungard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown, Jr. v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50110
Plaintiff:
Allen Brown, Jr. and Blue
Defendant:
Andrea Tack, Wende, Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv01956
Plaintiff:
Richard Hodges
Defendant:
Niccoelle E. Jackson and Tyneer N. Butler-Winters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. CCC Center of Correctional Concern et al
as 1:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
Johnathan N Mosley
Defendant:
CCC Center of Correctional Concern, Well Path and Mike Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Kelly et al
as 1:2024cv01846
Plaintiff:
Johnathan N Mosley
Defendant:
Mike Kelly, Well Path, S Hunckler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
