Cases 1 - 10 of 300
Fratus v. Webb et al
as 3:2024cv03467
Plaintiff:
John Fratus
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Webb, Correctional Officer G. Gil, Correctional Officer Molina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fratus v. Vaca
as 3:2024cv03469
Plaintiff:
John Fratus
Defendant:
Vaca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mrozek v. Eaton et al
as 3:2024cv03324
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Mrozek
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Eaton, CDCR Director Ron Broomfield, Voc. Instructor T. Ismans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Adams et al
as 5:2024cv03314
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Walker and Jeffrey Walker
Defendant:
Chief Adams, Sgt. Callaway, Lt. Clasal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fratus v. Washington et al
as 3:2024cv03261
Plaintiff:
John Fratus
Defendant:
Deputy Washington and Ofr. Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe, Two and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Doe, Dentist et al
as 3:2024cv02771
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dentist, John Doe, Dentist and Theodore Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Das v. Medvin, et al
as 3:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
Damodar Chandra Das
Defendant:
John Doe, Newman and Dr. Medvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. CDCR et al
as 4:2024cv01856
Plaintiff:
John W. Williams
Defendant:
CDCR and Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner
as 3:2024cv01875
Plaintiff:
Anthony K. Turner
Defendant:
Yolo County (Mayor), CDCR Director, Warden Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
