Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Lopez v. Ronneberg et al
as 4:2024cv04212
Defendant:
Sergeant Real, Morales, Sergeant Ronneberg and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. The People of California et al
as 4:2023cv06072
Plaintiff:
Warren Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
The People of California, C/O Rowe, C/O Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez v. Lee et al
as 4:2023cv03660
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lopez
Defendant:
M. Lee, Hamner, Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vining v. Private Contractor, GEO Group et al
as 5:2023cv02263
Plaintiff:
Jerome Vining
Defendant:
Private Contractor, GEO Group, Deputy Gonzales, A. Leeper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Montgomery
as 3:2023cv01784
Plaintiff:
Elijah Lee Miller
Defendant:
Andrew Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferber
as 3:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Ferber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartley v. Bright et al
as 5:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
Roger Andrew Hartley
Defendant:
D.O. D. Bright, M.D. Joseph Bick, K. Kumar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv05624
Plaintiff:
Norvell Andrew
Defendant:
United States of America, Andrew Ciolli, Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kramer v. Peres et al
as 3:2022cv03803
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kramer
Defendant:
Doctor Peres, Warden Ron Broomfield and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torfason v. California Forensic Medical Group
as 4:2022cv03458
Plaintiff:
James Paul Andrew Torfason
Defendant:
California Forensic Medical Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
