Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hall et al v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Brian Hall and Richard R. Blevins
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections and Jen Winkelman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Wade et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Joshua J Bradshaw
Defendant:
K. Brannwade, Steele, State of Alaska Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoltenberg et al v. Alaska Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Garino, Misipati Solaita, Ole Shangin and others
Defendant:
Nighswonger, Alaska Department of Corrections and Nancy Dahlstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Eugene Sampo v. Alaska Department of Corrections
as 3:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Sampo
Defendant:
Alaska Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoltenberg v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00171
Plaintiff:
Edwin Allen Stoltenberg
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Dean Williams, Shannon McCloud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tholson v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Leon-Michael: Tholson
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Jason Marvel, Tonia Enyard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Geo Group, The et al
as 1:2011cv01622
Plaintiff:
Ben Davis
Defendant:
Geo Group, The, Rachael Hurt and Alaska Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl Thompson v. Frank Luna, et al
as 09-17421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK LUNA, Warden, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Carl Thompson v. Frank Luna, et al
as 08-16450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK LUNA, Warden, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
