Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Dunn v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
John O. Dunn, II
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Joseph Burnette, Mr. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan Jones v. Telfair SP Warden, et al
as 23-13459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN LAWSON JONES, a.k.a. Vizion
Defendant / Appellee:
TELFAIR SP WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN VERONICA STEWART, DEPUTY WARDEN MARCUS and others
Jones v. Shropshire et al
as 3:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Bryan Lawson Jones and Vizion
Defendant:
Warden Ralph Shropshire, Deputy Warden Veronica Stewart, Warden Jermaine White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. MORRISON et al
as 7:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
ADRIEL NOEL MANN, SR
Defendant:
TANGIE MORRISON, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD, OFFICER GILLUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMPSON v. WICKER et al
as 5:2021cv00006
Plaintiff:
JOHN LAMAR SIMPSON
Defendant:
Robert Toole, Dep Warden Security Josh Wicker and OFFICER BENJAMIN FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAMBERS v. FORD et al
as 5:2021cv00001
Plaintiff:
ROY CHAMBERS, JR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN COFFEE, UNIT MANAGER JOHN DOE, DEPUTY WARDEN THORNTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. FORD et al
as 5:2020cv00479
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. WICKER et al
as 5:2020cv00427
Plaintiff:
JOHN LAMAR SIMPSON
Defendant:
DIRECTOR ROBERT TOOLE, Warden BENJAMIN FORD and DEPUTY WARDEN JOSH WICKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRITT v. FORD et al
as 5:2020cv00375
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL BRITT
Defendant:
WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. FORD et al
as 5:2020cv00374
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
