Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rios v. Curry County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00917
Plaintiff:
Manuel Rios
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center, FNU Summit and Summit Foods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helwig v. Curry County Detention Center
as 2:2020cv00052
Plaintiff:
Troy Helwig
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armijo v. Curry County Detention Center
as 2:2020cv00034
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Armijo
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Curry County Detention Center
as 2:2018cv00983
Plaintiff:
Bernard Parson
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyre v. Curry County Detention Center et al
as 2:2014cv00232
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hyre
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center, Tori Sandoval, FNU Saunders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirven v. Curry County Detention Center et al
as 1:2012cv00687
Plaintiff:
Charles Kirven
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center and Courtney M. Sexton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duque v. Curry County Manager et al
as 6:2010cv00637
Plaintiff:
Manuel Duque
Defendant:
Curry County Manager, Curry County Detention Center and County Jail Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Curry County Detention Center, et al.
as 6:2010cv00593
Plaintiff:
Luis D Chavez
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center and Curry County Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sena v. Curry County Detention Center et al
as 1:2009cv01223
Plaintiff:
Larry Charles Sena
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center and Curry County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirven v. Curry County Detention Center, et al
as 09-2026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOYDALE KIRVEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, WARDEN JOHNSON and CHRIS SENA, et al., in their individual and official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
