Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brandon Walker v. Department of Children and Family Services, et al
as 23-2089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES and CATHERINE HARVEY, DCFS Investigator
Keimon Crayton v. DHS of Illinois, et al
as 22-1693
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEIMON CRAYTON
Defendant / Appellee:
DHS OF ILLINOIS and DCFS OF ILLINOIS
Crayton v. DHS of Illinois et al
as 4:2022cv04053
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
DHS of Illinois and DCFS of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breazeale v. DCF et al
as 4:2019cv00111
Plaintiff:
Marty Christopher Breazeale
Defendant:
Parchman Prison and DCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DESPART v. DCF et al
as 4:2019cv00287
Defendant:
DCF, FCCC DIRECTOR and DONALD SAWYER
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DESPART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breazeale v. DCF et al
as 1:2019cv00330
Plaintiff:
Marty Christopher Breazeale
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Parchman Prison and DCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2017cv00416
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, LEON COUNTY FLORIDA, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. DIRECTOR OF DCF et al
as 4:2016cv00696
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L COOPER
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF DCF and UNIT DIRECTOR HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATORS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Budz et al
as 2:2012cv00666
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
Timothy Budz, George Emanoilidis, Ron Lawrenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boatman et al v. Florida Governor et al
as 2:2012cv00085
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman, FCCC Patients, James J. Jackson and others
Defendant:
Florida Governor, Secretary of DCF and Administrators and Directors and Employees of the Florida Civil Commitment Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
