Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Street v. GCRCF et al
as 1:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Howard Street
Defendant:
GCRCF, Lamar County, Perry County and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. G.C.R.C.F. et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Ray Charles Miller
Defendant:
G.C.R.C.F., Bobby C. Fairley, Burie Caine and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broome v. Havard et al
as 1:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Mark Broome
Defendant:
Keith Havard, Bobby C. Fairley, Stone County and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Havard v. Havard et al
as 1:2020cv00225
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Narcotics Task Force, Lucedale Police Dept., Jane and John Does 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Thomas Havard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stern v. Epps et al
as 3:2011cv00319
Plaintiff:
James H. Stern
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Margaret Bingham, Eddie Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. McMillin et al
as 3:2011cv00157
Plaintiff:
Detrick Dewayne Harris
Defendant:
Malcolm E. McMillin, Hinds County Detention Center, Unknown Patten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boone v. Epps et al
as 4:2009cv00131
Plaintiff:
Henry Lonzo Boone
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Lawence Kelly and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ihrke v. Epps et al
as 3:2009cv00663
Plaintiff:
Fabion Ihrke
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Gloria Perry and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boone v. Epps et al
as 3:2009cv00433
Plaintiff:
Henry Lonzo Boone
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Lawence Kelly and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Epps et al
as 3:2009cv00308
Plaintiff:
Travis Hill
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Gloria Perry and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
